The hypothesis of the character qualities asserts that we can portray ourselves with principle attributes: open, conscientious, extravert, agreeable and neurotic. Every one of us shifts in the amount of every attribute is displayed as a part of our character.
To get what every attribute truly implies how about we take a gander at these characters and how they adapt after they rank their boat and are abandoned on an island in the ocean.
Open Sita is energized and keen on investigating this lovely island. The extraordinary nature rouses her. She has gathered stones shells and blooms to beautify the passage of the bamboo hovel that she worked for everybody. She feels this is a chance to adapt such countless new things!
Sheela is conscientious. She isn't energized. She is worried about the reality of the circumstance. She is happy she saved the endurance unit from their boat. Of course, she is ready and starts the essential errands immediately. She feels that it is her obligation to put together everybody and ensure that they will begin searching for the things they need for endurance: freshwater and food.
Extravert Rahim is excited in light of the fact that they all endure! He feels a solid need to talk and share his bliss. He accumulates everybody to commend their endurance and to educate them concerning his arrangement to investigate the island together!
Agreeable Albert is thoughtful naturally and in spite of being drained and parched, his primary concern is Devi. He offers her a beverage from his coconut. The others realize that he for the most part consents to everything and are not modest to request his assistance.
Devi is neurotic and effectively focused. She has an absolute breakdown. She plunks down on the sea shore and cries: how are they truly going to move away from this island? To her the sea around them looks perpetual, nature looks dim and hazardous. She feels totally lost.
Following two months two boats show up not too far off everybody gets energized, Rahim has the plan to make a fire. He calls the others to help. Sheela promptly begins to work, Albert brings more wood, Sita is holding up her wonderfully organized SOS sign while Devi shouts frantically for help.
Much to their dismay who is cruising on these boats... The principal transport conveys a gathering of psychologists who have been venturing to every part of the ocean since the 1980s.
They are examining the character attributes which are otherwise called the five-factor or ocean model. The commander Lewis Goldberg instituted the expression "big five". He is excited when he sees the five companions at the ocean shore every one coordinating with precisely one attribute: open, conscientious, extravert, agreeable and neurotic.
However he chooses not to stop the boat, as a researcher he likes to watch from far off. On the other boat, five privateers all having the specific inverse attributes of our companions.
How about we check whether you can remember them?
Privateer one is genuinely steady and extremely loose. At the point when she sees the survivors on the sea shore she says: we could help them!
Privateer two promptly blows up with her. He isn't paying attention to anybody and isn't willing to change his arrangements to help a few outsiders on an island!
Privateer three thinks this is intricate. He believes that all potential results should be thought of. He wants to be separated from everyone else and think.
Privateer four couldn't care less. He's bustling searching for the keys to his money box which is lost once more.
The captain isn't available to any new encounters. He closes all conversations when he says our boat will not stop!
What's your opinion on the big five? Do you perceive your own character in a portion of the characteristics? Or then again do you think this hypothesis is imperfect as we can't depict a whole character in five boundaries?
In the event that you watch this in class and you don't know which qualities you have, pick a companion and portray one another. A large number of us are terrible at depicting ourselves, so an external point of view is frequently useful.
*
No comments:
Post a Comment